Friday, March 2, 2012

Module 13 and 14

COMPUTER CRIMES AND RELATED PHILIPPINE LAWS

Crimes in the Philippines Related to e-commerce:

1. =========================================================
*Crime Committed:    
 Hacking the government portal "gov.ph" and other government websites making this the first Philippine hacking case to have ended in a conviction.

*Name of Criminal/s:
Filipino Hacker, JJ Maria Giner

*Court’s Decision:         
Giner was sentenced to one to two years of imprisonment and will pay a fine of 100,000 pesos.

*Source:                      

2. =========================================================

*Crime Committed:

Filipino call center agent found guilty of hacking into the company he worked for and stealing credit card details. He was able to make online purchases worth more than $2,000 through illegal means. He was able to break into the computer system of the credit card company affiliated with his former employer Sitel Philippines.

*Name of Criminal/s:
            22-year old former call center agent, Jeffric Carlos Abiera.

*Court’s Decision:         
            He was sentenced by the Quezon City metropolitan court to a minimum imprisonment of one to two years plus a fine of P100,000 ($5,858) in violation of section 33 of the E-Commerce Law.

*Source:                    

3. ======================================================

*Crime Committed:

The cybercrime involves a former employee of a local manufacturing company accused of stealing company secrets from VMC using a universal serial bus thumb drive, which was used to copy proprietary company information.

*Name of Criminal/s:
            Chemists, Roschelle Claro, former head of quality control department of Vibelle Manufacturing Corp. (VMC)
*Court’s Decision:         
            Although details of the settlement were held by the courts, the license of the chemist was permanently revoked.

*Source:                    

4. =======================================================

*Crime Committed:

The accused was alleged to have illegally accessed the school's computer system with a password provided by her co-accused.

*Name of Criminal/s:
            Leilani Garcia, a former employee of the com­plainant, Thames International Business School. And her co-accused, Cesar MaƱalac, the former IT support chief of Thames.

*Court’s Decision:         
            Charged with violating a provision of RA 8792, also known as the e-commerce act of 2000,

*Source:                    

5. ========================================================

*Crime Committed:

Violation of Republic Act (RA) 9262, or the Anti-Violence Against Women and Children Act, for allegedly videotaping their sexual tryst and then uploading it on the Internet without the complainant’s consent.

*Name of Criminal/s:
            Former celebrity Doctor Hayden Kho Jr.

*Court’s Decision:
            Judge Rodolfo Bonifacio of the Pasig Regional Trial Court Branch 159 dismissed the cases after the prosecution camp failed to present sufficient proof to show Halili was unaware that she was being videotaped while having sex with Kho.

*Source:                    

http://barriosiete.com/court-junks-katrina-halilis-case-vs-hayden-kho-jr/


6. ======================================================

*Crime Committed:

Video Piracy

*Name of Criminal/s:
            11 Chinese nationals namely; Jiang Ming Zhi, Jhuang Shang Ti, Zheng Huo, Joshua Chen, Lee Hokbeng, Johan Ang, Uang Zhu Sy, Wen Jhong, William Tan, Kim Diang and Ong Wen San,

*Court’s Decision:
            Guilty beyond reasonable doubt and meted them three months and one day terms and each to pay a fine of P500,000 with subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency.

*Source:                    


7. ======================================================

*Crime Committed:

A quartet of hackers based in the Philippines have allegedly bilked AT&T and possibly other telecommunications companies out of millions, which they channeled to their own bank accounts and to accounts associated with a terrorist organization.

*Name of Criminal/s:
            Macnell Gracilla, Francisco Manalac, Regina Balura, and Paul Michael Kwan.

*Court’s Decision:
            The four were captured in the raid and are facing charges in the Philippines.

*Source:                    


8. =====================================================

*Crime Committed:

Conviction for fraud of two Asian foreigners by a local court.

*Name of Criminal/s:
            Lim alias Young Ma Park and Leung alias Sung Seub Lee

*Court’s Decision:
            The two pleaded guilty when charged, which explained the lighter jail term, normally a maximum of five years, and lower fine.

*Source:                    


9. ====================================================

*Crime Committed:

Nabbed for credit card fraud. A woman posing as a sales agent for a credit card company was arrested by authorities after she was caught purchasing a laptop computer using someone else’s credit card.

*Name of Criminal/s:
            Melinda Asuncion

*Court’s Decision:
            Arrested.

 *Source:              


10. ======================================================

*Crime Committed:

Businessman convicted for software piracy found violating the intellectual property rights of software makers Microsoft and Adobe Systems, court records showed.

*Name of Criminal/s:
            Nestor Yao, managing director of Gains Computer and Telecommunications Inc.

*Court’s Decision:
            The local businessman faces a prison sentence of one year for one case, and three to six years for the other case. The court also required him to pay a total of 200,000 pesos.

*Source:                    




Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Module 12

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 

What is there for to rejoice if you have the intellectual property on something? Would it be a great instrument to the economic growth of the country? Or you are just the sole beneficiary of the fruits you have reaped from what you have sowed? Explain.
Claiming Intellectual property rights has its own benefits and advantages both to the beneficiary and to the economy. Why? Because everything needs proper management or control. We need to claim certain things to avoid duplication and other related mess and also to have control to what is rightfully ours in the first place. Naturally, we should gain from what we have done. It is a universal fact. But the benefits one can have by claiming intellectual property is not limited only for the beneficiary but also for the economy in the form of taxes taken from the beneficiary. It can serve as a great instrument for the economic growth of our country for I it is believed that tax can help us rise from poverty. Not instantly but maybe gradually.

Module 11

FREE SPEECH ISSUES

1. Facebook’s marketing director, who happens to be Mark Zuckerberg’s sister, proposed last year that banning online anonymity would help curtail cyber-bullying and Internet harassment. Then-Google CEO Eric Schmidt made a similar observation in year 2010, noting that “privacy is incredibly important” but “not the same thing as anonymity.” If banning is already imposed or will be imposed would this stop annoying comments against someone freely posted by an anonymous FB user? Is this ethical? Is this against the freedom of speech? Support your answer.
Harassment is widely evident in various sites nowadays. It is causing a big headache for others. Maybe, banning online anonymity would restrain internet harassment's and cyber-bullying. What is there to post annoying comments with when it is already banned? So maybe, it is one of the few solutions our great minds would have thought so far. Especially in FB, users are free to say and post everything they want to anybody in the network. But some certainly don’t know their limitations. They tend to hurt others feelings and maybe intentionally harass certain people. This is way against the freedom of speech that is bestowed upon us. We have the freedom as well as the responsibility to our own usage of freedom. But being irresponsible is one thing that can be permanently connected to us human species. We tend to abuse our freedom. So certain implementations that are justifiable and righteous would be appropriate nowadays. Banning online anonymity is not wholly against our freedom of speech but it is just a restraining material to hold us back from certain irresponsibility’s that we might tend to do.


2.Is it ethical to blog both awful and pleasant experiences with your ex-girlfriend / ex-boyfriend? Discuss.
As what I believe, experiences and special moments in life are worth sharing be it to friends or to strangers. But in everything we do, there are also these certain limitations and boundaries that we must set to ourselves to avoid undesirable consequences. In the matter of a girl-boy relationship, I strongly consider the privacy of the relationship. You can shout to the world your relationship and brag about how happy you are or even how sad you are for having misunderstandings, but sharing appalling experiences together with your partner to others is out of the question. It is unethical from the fact that it is not the business of others anymore. You might not know that posting or shouting such terrible experiences with your lover can make others think unlikely about you. Do you want others to discriminate or humiliate you? Of course not. Who, in their right mind, would want such thing? Even telling others about amusing experiences with your lover should be minimized. It gets annoying in the long run. Choose the right things you tend to share and especially, choose the right person or group of people whom you relay your stories to.
This doesn’t mean that you cannot tell or blog the things you want to say or tell since we all have our own special way of expressing ourselves. But we just have to think wisely and be responsible of our actions before we actually do it and think highly of ourselves and other’s feelings.